Abstract
Architectures of Play
Karmen Franinovic
Can architectures of play disrupt our behavioural patterns and produce new forms of social interaction in urban space? How can play help us transform our often quasi automatic quotidian actions (Bourdieu)? Can responsive environments produce new bodily movements or challenge the established ones (Mauss) ? From the hidden group events in grottos, follies and labyrinths of Italian and French gardens to open activities of Fun Palace project, architects understood the spaces of play as opportunities for exploration of phenomenological and social experiences. The uncertainty of play allows us to probe new behaviours, to poke the boundaries of subjectivity and to engage into new becomings together with people, things and systems participating in play. This opportunity to reinvent the world through play has been the source of various artistic, architectural and theatrical projects. Through analysis of the latter this essay explores how the design of material context (intangible and tangible one) and responsive technologies embedded in architecture may foster playful activities in public spaces, , particularly those forms of play which enable us to critically embrace and transform our everyday life. Paper will discuss how theoretical ideas and practical proposals of artists and architects such as R. Schechner, C. Price and J. Littlewood (Fun Palace) provide foundation for creation of contemporary responsive playgrounds.
References:
Architecture and Play, first published in Potlatch #20. 1955. in Theory of the Dérive and Other Situationist Writings on the City, ed. L. Andreotti and X. Costa, trans. P. Hammond and G. DenÃs. Barcelona: Museu D’Art Contemporani, ACTAR, 1996.
P. H. R. Banham, P. Barker and C. Price. Non-plan: an experiment in freedom. New
Society, 12(338):435–441, 1969.
P. Bourdieu. Distinction. London: Routledge. 1984.
E. Barba, Beyond the Floating Islands, New York: PAJ Publications. 1986.
J.A. Bargh and T.L. Chartrand. The unbearable automaticity of being. American
Psychologist, 54, 462-479. 1999.
G. Bateson, Steps to an ecology of Mind, New York: Ballantine Books. 1972.
R. Caillois. Man, Play and Games. Chicago: University of Illinois Press. 2001.
M. Csikszentmihalyi. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 1975.
Enactive conference, Retrieved on May, 2007, from www.enactive2005.org
H. Gadamer. Play as a Guideline to Ontological Explanation. In J.C.B. Mohr
(Ed.), Hermeneutik I, Truth and Method. pp. 107-139. Tübingen. 1990
M. Gins and Arakawa. Architectural Body. University Alabama Press. 2002.
E. Goffman. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday. 1959.
F. Guattari. Chaosmosis: An Ethico-aesthetic Paradigm. Bloomington: Indiana Uni. Press, 1995.
R. A. Hodgkin. Playing and Exploring, Methuen, London, UK. 1985.
J. Huizinga. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. New York: Beacon
Press. 1986.
M. Kuzmanovic and N. Gaffney. Human-Scale Systems in Responsive Environments. IEEE Multimedia Vol. 12, No. 1, 2005.
M. Kuzmanovic and N. Gaffney. Multiplex Translations | Entangled Aphasia. International Conference on Media Futures. 2001, Florence, Italy.
J. Littlewood and C. Price. The fun palace. The Drama Review: TDR, 12(3):127–134,
1968.
S. Mathews, From Agit-prop to Free Space: The Architecture of Cedric Price, Black Dog Publishing, 2007.
M. Mauss “Body Techniquesâ€, Sociology and Psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. p. 97-123. 1979.
A. Noe, Art as Enaction, "Art as enaction." Interdiscipline Online Symposium on Art and Cogntion. 2002.
G. Pask. The Architectural Relevance of Cybernetics. AD: Architectural Design, 1969.
G. Pask Fun Palace Cybernetics Committee. Meeting Notes. (1964). Fun Palace
document folio DR 1 W5:O 1 88526. Cedric Price Archives.
C. Price. memorandum. 1964. Fun Palace document folio DR 1995:0188:526. Cedric
Price Archives.
F. Schiller. On the Aesthetic Education of Man, in a Series of Letters. 1793. E.M. Wilkinson and L.S. Willoughby (Trans.). Oxford: Gutenberg Press. 1967.
M. Spariousu. Dionysus Reborn: Play and the Aesthetic Dimension. In Modern
Philosophical and Scientific Discourse. Ithaca, New York: Cornell Univ.Press. 1989.
R. Schechner. The Future of the Ritual: Writings on Culture and Performance.
Routledge, New York 1993.
X. W. Sha, "The TGarden Performance Research Project." Modern Drama, 48.3, Fall,
Special Issue: Technology. 585-608. 2005.
X. W. Sha and M. Kuzmanovic. Performing Publicly in Responsive Space: Agora, Piazza, Festival and Street. Worlds in Transition. technoscience, EASST Conference: Citizenship and Culture In the 21st. Century. 2000, Vienna, Austria.
X. W. Sha, Y. Visell, B. MacIntyre, A Dynamical-Systems Based Multimedia
Choreography Engine, GVU Technical report, Georgia Tech University, 2003.
V. Turner. Brain, body and culture. Zygon 18 (3) : 221-245. 1983.
F. Varela, "The reenchantment of the Concrete", Incorporations, p. 320-338. Zone Books. 1992.
L. Wittgenstein. Philosophical Investigations 1, Oxford, United Kingdom:
Blackwell Publishing. 1958.
